Jump to content

chasfh

The 116th United States Congress (2019-2021)

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, stanpapi said:

So what you're saying is ...photo of Trump...

No...

But Trump's *** is wider than a 6-lane highway (see pics just above).

He's giving President Taft a run for his money.

Trump is at 6' 1" and 345 #'s... yeah, just a smidge less obese than William Howard Taft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure there is enough room for this between all the Trump hate, but since this thread is called "The 116th United States Congress;" an observation.

One of the wheels from Gilead Sciences (ticker; GILD - drug company) got grilled by congress.  While I don't agree with all that AOC has to say - she put on quite a show.  She's got some nads; good on her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Motown Bombers said:

They don't make belts that big. 

I didn't know they made zippers that long until I saw nadler sit down in a chair. Seriously, that must set off metal detectors every time he flies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, screwball said:

I'm not sure there is enough room for this between all the Trump hate, but since this thread is called "The 116th United States Congress;" an observation.

One of the wheels from Gilead Sciences (ticker; GILD - drug company) got grilled by congress.  While I don't agree with all that AOC has to say - she put on quite a show.  She's got some nads; good on her.

I like her.  She has a lot of energy and passion which is more than you can say for most of the rest of those clowns.  She is also not dumb like they are trying to make her out to be.  Just inexperienced.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Closeted Republican attacks Amash on TV for speaking truth to power.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone remember a while back when we got to read endless post after endless post from our "always right" socialist Stanpapi about how AOC and her friends were so wrong and stupid and dumb for fighting against the massive transfer of wealth from NYC taxpayers to Amazon (who doesn't pay federal taxes)?

Wait for it....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

socialist Stanpapi was wrong. 

https://nypost.com/2019/05/27/amazon-is-reportedly-eyeing-office-space-on-manhattans-west-side/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, pfife said:

Anyone remember a while back when we got to read endless post after endless post from our "always right" socialist Stanpapi about how AOC and her friends were so wrong and stupid and dumb for fighting against the massive transfer of wealth from NYC taxpayers to Amazon (who doesn't pay federal taxes)?

Wait for it....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

socialist Stanpapi was wrong. 

https://nypost.com/2019/05/27/amazon-is-reportedly-eyeing-office-space-on-manhattans-west-side/

 

Or people on here lecturing her for being young and immature for rallying support against Amazon, as if she didn't have well reasoned arguments. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, pfife said:

Anyone remember a while back when we got to read endless post after endless post from our "always right" socialist Stanpapi about how AOC and her friends were so wrong and stupid and dumb for fighting against the massive transfer of wealth from NYC taxpayers to Amazon (who doesn't pay federal taxes)?

Wait for it....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

socialist Stanpapi was wrong. 

https://nypost.com/2019/05/27/amazon-is-reportedly-eyeing-office-space-on-manhattans-west-side/

 

She represents queens and the bronx, not manhattan. Her district is 15 miles from Manhattan and in decidedly different economic straights. Amazon was seeking 4-8 million square feet in her district for their headquarters. They are now apparently seeking a couple hundred thousand extra square feet in Manhattan.

I recognize you know nothing about real estate, but those two footprints could not be more different. But as per usual....

Image result for the point.....you

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, stanpapi said:

She represents queens and the bronx, not manhattan. Her district is 15 miles from Manhattan and in decidedly different economic straights. Amazon was seeking 4-8 million square feet in her district for their headquarters. They are now apparently seeking a couple hundred thousand extra square feet in Manhattan.

I recognize you know nothing about real estate, but those two footprints could not be more different. But as per usual....

Image result for the point.....you

 

 

Cheif, the actual point is that Amazon doesn't need taxpayer money to hq in nyc,  as evidenced by amazon tryna hq in nyc without the socialisms, but you be you

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, pfife said:

Cheif, the actual point is that Amazon doesn't need taxpayer money to hq in nyc,  as evidenced by amazon tryna hq in nyc without the socialisms, but you be you

 

The point you apparently missed is that Amazon doesn't headquarter anywhere with a mere 100,000-200,000 square feet. That's the equivalent of a run down bungalo in Royal oak to them from a space perspective. That's why it's a non-story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, stanpapi said:

The point you apparently missed is that Amazon doesn't headquarter anywhere with a mere 100,000-200,000 square feet. That's the equivalent of a run down bungalo in Royal oak to them from a space perspective. That's why it's a non-story.

I trust the article vs stan the proven liar, sorry cheif, shoulda thought about that before repeatedly lying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, pfife said:

I trust the article vs stan the proven liar, sorry cheif, shoulda thought about that before repeatedly lying

I recognize you don't have a deep understanding of real estate or finance. Which is why you bought the headline and don't understand what the reason the story got planted in the first place....or what the manhattan space is in fact intended for. Said another way, I don't have an interest in continuing to demonstrate your foolishness anymore on this story. You're already there. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, stanpapi said:

I recognize you don't have a deep understanding of real estate or finance. Which is why you bought the headline and don't understand what the reason the story got planted in the first place....or what the manhattan space is in fact intended for. Said another way, I don't have an interest in continuing to demonstrate your foolishness anymore on this story. You're already there. 

Except you lie all the time so whatev

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, pfife said:

Except you lie all the time so whatev

Zero substance in the response yet again...I'll keep rooting for you to add something productive to the discourse though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, stanpapi said:

Zero substance in the response yet again...I'll keep rooting for you to add something productive to the discourse though.

No it was definitely substantive.  You reap what you sow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly you don't have a deep understanding of real estate unless you have filed multiple bankruptcies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Motown Bombers said:

Clearly you don't have a deep understanding of real estate unless you have filed multiple bankruptcies. 

And lost 3 casinos, an airline, and your mega-yacht....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, 84 Lives!!! said:

And lost 3 casinos, an airline, and your mega-yacht....

The casinos are the most telling.  They are not for everyone.  You have to be amoral and corrupt to stay in that business, but how do you bankrupt a casino?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Mr. Bigglesworth said:

Not manage it.

when you let the mob use it to launder money

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This argument is interesting...its all part of the strategy to take the Senate

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For sure... that's what I have been thinking all along... there's great opportunity for Senate pickups especially if you put those incumbents on notice in a swing state.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I’ve been thinking.

i want all those names as part of the official historical record.

Aaaand, yes, it would help in same states to dislodge them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...