Jump to content
chasfh

The Presidency of Donald J. Trump

Recommended Posts

FanDuel Michigan Sports Betting

FanDuel Michigan $100 Launch Offer

Michigan online sports betting is launching shortly ( December 2020 or January 2021). Pre-register at FanDuel Sportsbook and get $50 free sports bets + $50 free online casino bets with no deposit necessary. Claim $100 at FanDuel Michigan Now

40 minutes ago, CMRivdog said:

 

The Emily Litella defense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pants-fallen-around-the-ankles stupidity from the WH

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, smr-nj said:

Same guy that nominated him a few years back for his meeting with Kim jung Un

Anyone know what we got from the NK meeting?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump threatens to send in military troops if riots occur following an election victory

Mica Soellne

© Provided by Washington Examiner

Quote

Any rioters who spread violence should President Trump win a second term in November could be met with military force, Trump warned.

In an interview with Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, Trump said any threat of rioting will be stopped immediately, citing the Insurrection Act.

"We'll put them down very quickly if they do that," Trump said, according toPolitico, which obtained a preview of the interview. "We have the right to do that. We have the power to do that if we want."

He continued, "Look, it's called insurrection. We just send in, and we do it very easy. I mean, it's very easy. I'd rather not do that because there's no reason for it, but if we had to, we'd do that and put it down within minutes."

The Insurrection Act allows the president to deploy the military and National Guard within the country in extreme circumstances to quell civil disorder.

The full interview with Pirro is set to air on Saturday.

=========================

So, if HIS supporters riot WHEN he loses, will he be sending the military? 

Or, if people gather celebrating  a Biden win, will that be viewed as “rioting”, and necessitate sending troops?

All too ridiculous. Mr. “I don’t want to cause panic” is .... well... panicking.

But here’s my question: Who is whispering all these things into his ear? You know damn well he doesn’t know enough history or law to even think of this himself, ...so who’s doing this? Is it Miller? Who else? It’s sickening. It’s treasonous. It’s criminal. 

When will somebody.. ANYbody push back?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note ; the last part, after the === are MY questions 

I messed up formatting that big time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if there are riots if he loses?  Will he still send in the troops?  

Edit: Oh, the article asks the same question.  

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, tiger337 said:

What if there are riots if he loses?  Will he still send in the troops?  

Edit: Oh, the article asks the same question.  

 

Actually, Lee,  that’s me asking that same question. 🙂

The article ends at the ====.

I just totally messed up the formatting, and can’t seem to fix it, so I left it... *shrug*. Been a long day. lol

But, yeah, what’s his parameters for throwing the military at everybody?

And my other question still is - who is putting these ideas in his head? Miller? Hannity? It’s not originating in his head.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This human garbage needs to be swept out in November

I particularly note the part about the "probe could fade away"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Motown Bombers said:
Answer to what we got at the summit.
 

Alarmist non-sense alert:

Make no mistake, Trump admires this, and would love to do the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Alarmist non-sense alert:

Make no mistake, Trump admires this, and would love to do the same.

I don't think there is evidence that he would love to kill people.  If he could get praise for it he would probably do it, but I have not gotten a sense from what he has done or said that he is sadistic.    There have been countless rumors of sexual assault, financial fraud, etc, but there have not been rumors about him ordering people killed.  If there had been hints about it, there most certainly would be rumors.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, tiger337 said:

I don't think there is evidence that he would love to kill people.  If he could get praise for it he would probably do it, but I have not gotten a sense from what he has done or said that he is sadistic.    There have been countless rumors of sexual assault, financial fraud, etc, but there have not been rumors about him ordering people killed.  If there had been hints about it, there most certainly would be rumors.  

If it's hard evidence as positive proof you're waiting for, you probably won't get that until he were to actually do it. But I wouldn't put at least the desire past anyone whose entire brand is built on identifying enemies and relentlessly attacking them in increasingly apocalyptic and existential terms, and who is known to admire dictators who engage in that very behavior.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would he sadistically be glad or get pleasure from people dying?  I have no evidence to say yes.  Would he care if people died?  Not at all.  Unless that death hurt him somehow... financially or whatever.  I don't think he cares about anybody except certain immediate family.  By that I mean like 2 or 3 people at most.  Everyone else is there for his own pleasure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Oblong said:

Would he sadistically be glad or get pleasure from people dying?  I have no evidence to say yes.  Would he care if people died?  Not at all.  Unless that death hurt him somehow... financially or whatever.  I don't think he cares about anybody except certain immediate family.  By that I mean like 2 or 3 people at most.  Everyone else is there for his own pleasure.

After reading Mary Trump's book, I don't think he cares about immediate family members if they can't benefit him. Donald didn't care about his father once he got alzheimer's. His father had nothing to offer him at that point. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ivanka because maybe in some post apocalyptic world it would be acceptable for him to have sex with her... like you see in novels or history.  And Barron because maybe he won’t be as dumb as the other two. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Oblong said:

Ivanka because maybe in some post apocalyptic world it would be acceptable for him to have sex with her... like you see in novels or history.  And Barron because maybe he won’t be as dumb as the other two. 

Robert Heinlein meets pornhub.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Michigan Sports Betting Offer

FanDuel Sportsbook Michigan - Sports Betting is launching in Michigan shortly (December 2020 or January 2021). If you register before it launches you will recieve $50 dollars at their online sportsbook and online casino!

Click Here to claim the FanDuel Michigan for $50 at Online Sportsbook & Casino Pre-registration Bonus Now

Motown Sports Blog



×
×
  • Create New...