Jump to content
Yoda

2015 Off-season thread

Recommended Posts

I don't understand what this means.

Tigers, Mariners, Red Sox, Dbacks, Rays, Twins, Indians no draft roster too full.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BetMGM Michigan $200 Free Offer - Launching Friday (1/22)

BetMGM Michigan Sports Betting
Michigan online sports betting is launching on Friday, January 22, 2021. Pre-register at BetMGM Sportsbook & Casino and get a free $200 bonus at their online sportsbook & casino with no deposit necessary.

Claim $200 at BetMGM Michigan Now

I'd give Avila an A pending LF...he has until the season trade deadline to submit for his final grade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To be clear this is how I see it and I don't have a problem with it.

That written, it is somewhat risky because I think that approach is a higher ceiling and a lower floor approach, the lower floor being that Mike doesn't open up the checkbook in the end.

OTOH, if you truly believe they can't make the post-season absent the higher ceiling outcome, then it really isn't much of a choice from Avila's perspective. Whether you win 83 or 85 but out of the post-season is meaningless.

It's arguable, but I think they had more issues with their staff, than they did with their position players going into next year. The only spot I question is the need for the $ they spent on Pelfrey, but with Sanchez, Norris, Boyd/Fullmer/Greene, and even Verlander being far from sure things, he gives a significant amount of security. I think as constructed they should reasonably be able to get to 87-90 wins. If Miggy stays healthy and Victor and Sanchez bounce back I can see them getting into the low 90's. If those 3 are like last year, I could see them down to 81-85. Add one of the top 4 LF options and I think the range goes to 85-95 wins depending on the above factors

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tigers, Mariners, Red Sox, Dbacks, Rays, Twins, Indians no draft roster too full.

Thanks. There for a minute, I didn't when they had to know the way for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's arguable, but I think they had more issues with their staff, than they did with their position players going into next year.

To be fair, I believe you were advocating trading Kinsler for Andrew Miller, so it is pretty clear to me where your preferences lie WRT relief pitching and positional players.

I disagree with that calculus, but it is a matter of opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can assure you Al will spend every dollar he's given. No reason not to.

I guess it would depend whether he is given a hardline budget for the entire year or just one budget for free agency/trading before the season and then another one during the season. Say Illitch says, "You can spend $200M on salaries this year." Then if AA spends $200M before the season starts, he can't trade for anyone at the deadline, unless Illitch raises the budget mid-season (which he may well do).

But without knowing how it's framed, it's hard to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that the rule 5 draft is over, I expect the trade with the Brewers for krod to be completed. Which player from our 40 man is it going to be?

I'll go with Ferrel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To be fair, I believe you were advocating trading Kinsler for Andrew Miller, so it is pretty clear to me where your preferences lie WRT relief pitching and positional players.

I disagree with that calculus, but it is a matter of opinion.

I only felt that way if we had acquired a reasonable replacement for Kinsler. I greatly prefer the route that was taken.

To add, no way do I do the trade if Machado is our fall-back for Kinsler.

Edited by 4hzglory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now that the rule 5 draft is over, I expect the trade with the Brewers for krod to be completed. Which player from our 40 man is it going to be?

I'll go with Ferrel.

Wouldn't it be a guy not on the 40-man? De La Rosa?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Surely he is given a cost target to hold for the season and can request more on a case by case basis.

I would think so too, but I'd be curious sometime to hear the inner workings of an MLB budget process. Of course it probably varies owner by owner. I just have no idea what parameters Illitch gives AA. And even if he knows he "can" go back and request more later, who knows whether he'll always get Mr. I to sign off on it, or to what extent. Without knowing a ton, I'd suspect he's going to hold back a little bit for later, just in case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wouldn't it be a guy not on the 40-man? De La Rosa?

I think it could be either. Milwaukee didn't want to use up a roster spot for the player, but Detroit didn't necessarily need to protect him. In the case the player the Brewers wanted was taken in the Rule 5, there could have been an alternative player. If I remember correctly, Detroit was also potentially getting a PTBNL. That might be contingent on which player the Brewers get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know if it is fair to criticize him for not convincing Ilitch to increase the budget. In my experience I think there is only so much one man can do to convince another man to spend more of his $$$.

I do, however, think it would be a fair to question if his priorities were correct if he is budget limited. In other words, I would have made getting an upgrade in LF as a higher priority versus acquiring 3 RP, or a back end starter for that matter.

He's the GM and the Vice President. Ilitch hired him to make the 2015 team into a championship team, and part of that is presenting scenarios to Mike that get them to that spot.

I think it's fair to criticize him for not getting an extra 20 million when they are already spending 180.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wouldn't it be a guy not on the 40-man? De La Rosa?

If it was a guy they wanted but only if he wasn't selected, then sure.

I was thinking it was a guy on the 40 that the Brewers didn't want to be carrying so they would have more room to make a rule 5 pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He's the GM and the Vice President. Ilitch hired him to make the 2015 team into a championship team, and part of that is presenting scenarios to Mike that get them to that spot.

I think it's fair to criticize him for not getting an extra 20 million when they are already spending 180.

I guess what I struggle with is I have no reason to think Avila didn't lay out the scenarios well or objectively.

As such, if he is stuck at $180M, my assumption is Mike set a hard limit at 180 because reasons, as opposed to the alternative that Al did not present it to him or didn't present it well / effectively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really would love to see them add another decent arm. Not as much as I'd love to see a big hitter tho.

I'd rather sign one of the big 4 and forget about extending JD. Just enjoy having two studs in the corners for the next 2 years and hope an internal option is ready to step up in 2018, or that Avila can find the next JD, rather than give him 100 mil and go with a scrub platoon in 2016.

@JonHeymanCBS 2h2 hours ago

Folks around baseball would not be surprised to see tigers make late run at big hitter if 1's left. Current focus: pen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess what I struggle with is I have no reason to think Avila didn't lay out the scenarios well or objectively.

As such, if he is stuck at $180M, my assumption is Mike set a hard limit at 180 because reasons, as opposed to the alternative that Al did not present it to him or didn't present it well / effectively.

And I'm saying if ilitch gave him that hard limit given all the offseason needs and the current money committed that he didn't do a good enough job laying out his case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would think so too, but I'd be curious sometime to hear the inner workings of an MLB budget process. Of course it probably varies owner by owner. I just have no idea what parameters Illitch gives AA. And even if he knows he "can" go back and request more later, who knows whether he'll always get Mr. I to sign off on it, or to what extent. Without knowing a ton, I'd suspect he's going to hold back a little bit for later, just in case.

I suppose I see no good reason for an owner to run it any differently than saying to his/her GM that you have x amount of payroll and both understand that if there are developments in the future that merit re-evaluating the budget, there will be a re-evaluation at that time.

From the GM's perspective, there is very little gained by keeping money back to make a later trade. There is no guarantee a trade that makes sense but requires x amount of additional pay-roll will manifest itself. I would go so far as to say such a trade is unlikely to manifest itself.

If you end up barely missing the post-season, the owner isn't going to view not spending the $5M or $10 you 'saved' as a positive. Also, if the team makes the post-season on a reduced pay-roll, it probably only means your payroll will be cut to that level for the next season. So the reward doesn't warrant the risk in most cases, I'd imagine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Really would love to see them add another decent arm. Not as much as I'd love to see a big hitter tho.

I'd rather sign one of the big 4 and forget about extending JD. Just enjoy having two studs in the corners for the next 2 years and hope an internal option is ready to step up in 2018, or that Avila can find the next JD, rather than give him 100 mil and go with a scrub platoon in 2016.

@JonHeymanCBS 2h2 hours ago

Folks around baseball would not be surprised to see tigers make late run at big hitter if 1's left. Current focus: pen

I wouldn't mind adding a guy like Tommy Hunter. Not sure what his asking price will be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And I'm saying if ilitch gave him that hard limit given all the offseason needs and the current money committed that he didn't do a good enough job laying out his case.

Surely it is possible to lay out an objectively great case that should be convincing and the owner simply say 'no'?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why do I see Ryan Raburn written all over this

Agree unless they work out a trade I could definitely see this happening

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Michigan Sports Betting Offer

Michigan is launching online sports betting and casino apps on Friday, January 22, 2021. These top Michigan sportsbooks have pre-launch bonus offers. No deposit is required. Terms and conditions apply.

BetRivers Michigan - If you sign up at BetRivers Michigan now, you will receive $50 in free bets to use one their online sportsbook & casino

Click Here to claim $50 at BetRivers Michigan For Signing Up Now

FanDuel Michigan - If you register now before FanDuel launches in January, you will receive $100 to use at their sportsbook app & online casino.

Click Here to claim $100 at FanDuel Michigan For Registering Now

BetMGM Michigan - If you sign up early at BetMGM Michigan before launch, you will receive $200 in free bets to use at their online casino & sportsbook

Click Here to claim $200 at BetRivers Michigan For Signing Up Early

   


×
×
  • Create New...