Jump to content

Deleterious

Lawrence Frank has been fired

Recommended Posts


Maybe he doesn't want to leave his job in SA? Is there something wrong with this guy?

Maybe he's cool with just being an assistant? Maybe he doesn't want to take on a losing situation as a head coach?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe teams saw what a crappy coach Mike Brown became and don't want to hire any more Popovich assistants. :grin:

I heard Brown is going back to Cleveland.

Jeff Van Gundy is a nobody, so who cares what he thinks.

This is just nonsense. What is becoming clear from the way the media has talked about the Pistons is that no one outside of Detroit is excited about Greg Monroe. The only piece worth mentioning from the national media has been Drummond. Monroe does not get people excited about the Pistons front court.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This isn't the first time from JVG, he's been perpetually down on Detroit, I don't think he likes Dumars. I think SVG is probably out because of this too.

It's not about liking Dumars. He just thinks Dumars does a crappy job, which is true. The Pistons job isn't an appealing one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's not about liking Dumars. He just thinks Dumars does a crappy job, which is true. The Pistons job isn't an appealing one.

JVG rips every team that "fires coaches", he commented previously about Dumars something about when the going gets tough, Dumars fires the coach.

He is very hard on all teams that fire coaches, being a formerly fired coach himself he has a soft spot.

The Pistons job is very appealing, frontcourt foundation is built, upcoming lotto pick, and 25 million in cap room, a new owner vowing to spend what it takes, a historically good franchise. The Pistons are set to improve substantially in the next year, so the next coach really won't have a lot of pressure on it.

Here is a blurb about Jerry Sloan from another Forum.

Dave Checketts: Jerry Sloan thought about Pistons coaching job for “a couple of days” | Living and Dying by the Jazz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JVG rips every team that "fires coaches", he commented previously about Dumars something about when the going gets tough, Dumars fires the coach.

He is very hard on all teams that fire coaches, being a formerly fired coach himself he has a soft spot.

The Pistons job is very appealing, frontcourt foundation is built, upcoming lotto pick, and 25 million in cap room, a new owner vowing to spend what it takes, a historically good franchise. The Pistons are set to improve substantially in the next year, so the next coach really won't have a lot of pressure on it.

Here is a blurb about Jerry Sloan from another Forum.

Dave Checketts: Jerry Sloan thought about Pistons coaching job for “a couple of days” | Living and Dying by the Jazz

It should be appealing, but it isn't. Because first sign of trouble and the coach is fired. There is no stability because of Joe Dumars. Dumars has a free pass to **** up as much as he wants. The coaches out there know it. The blame always is laid on the coach, which is unfathomable with how bad Dumars has been.

The Sloan piece further backed my argument, he didn't want the Pistons job either. No one wants to take a job where they are the first one in line to be fired, regardless of the circumstances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It should be appealing, but it isn't. Because first sign of trouble and the coach is fired. There is no stability because of Joe Dumars. Dumars has a free pass to **** up as much as he wants. The coaches out there know it. The blame always is laid on the coach, which is unfathomable with how bad Dumars has been.

The Sloan piece further backed my argument, he didn't want the Pistons job either. No one wants to take a job where they are the first one in line to be fired, regardless of the circumstances.

Exactly this. Good luck attracting a coach when you treat them like garbage. The only ones you'll get are the ones nobody else wants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly this. Good luck attracting a coach when you treat them like garbage. The only ones you'll get are the ones nobody else wants.

I almost think this is a bigger issue than the roster mistakes. I mean, at this point, who is going to be attracted to come here when the justifiable perception is that they will only have two seasons to work with?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I almost think this is a bigger issue than the roster mistakes. I mean, at this point, who is going to be attracted to come here when the justifiable perception is that they will only have two seasons to work with?

What coaches are available?

I don't think the past history scares too many coaches really, the assistants looking to make the move will take most any job, and the retreads will also.

I don't think this question will be answered until we see the new coach.

What would people think of Nate McMillan for example? Where would he rate? What coaches would people expect to get for this team, if Dumars wasn't the GM? I don't think the coach firing history matters much, but I do think Dumars being a lame duck may make a difference.

Really, other then Kuester which coach was a bad hire at the time, or a settled for hire? Which coach shouldn't have been fired?

Obviously, I don't think Dumars wanted to fire Carlisle, and Larry Brown wanted to get fired.

Edited by DrWho17

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really, other then Kuester which coach was a bad hire at the time, or a settled for hire? Which coach shouldn't have been fired?

Flip Saunders and Curry were both poor hires. Flip wasn't egregious or anything, but he was the exact opposite coach the Pistons needed at the time. And Michael Curry, that might be worse than the Kuester hire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An Easy Sell | THE OFFICIAL SITE OF THE DETROIT PISTONS

Coaches of winning teams who tack right or left when seas get choppy are hailed for their ability to adjust. Coaches of losing teams who do so are derided for their lack of conviction.

No one thought Daly a genius when he fled the spectacular disaster that was the Ted Stepien Cleveland Cavaliers with a 9-32 record. If it hadn’t been for Jack McCloskey and their common ties to the University of Pennsylvania, it’s likely Daly – hardly a young man, 52, when the Cleveland experience was unplugged – would have never gotten another shot in the NBA, his genius undiscovered.

If Phil Jackson hadn’t been in the right place when Jerry Krause ousted Doug Collins – the right place being assistant coach of Michael Jordan’s team – he probably would have been dismissed as a crackpot Zen hippie. Popovich might have coached his backside off had his first shot come with the expansion Vancouver Grizzlies instead of the Tim Duncan-David Robinson Spurs and no one ever would have guessed he was headed for enshrinement in Springfield.

Dumars built an NBA title team from scraps, essentially, inheriting a roster with nothing approaching a star player once Grant Hill high-tailed it for Orlando a month after Bill Davidson turned the Pistons over to him. He did it within four years of assuming command, an astonishing achievement in a superstar-driven league.

The rebuilding is well under way. Greg Monroe and Andre Drummond give the Pistons two rare building blocks – young, big and talented – that separate them from virtually everyone else dining at the lottery-team table.

Their presence also will differentiate the Pistons from other teams casting lines in the pool of coaching candidates, but Monroe and Drummond aren’t the only things Joe Dumars will take to the marketplace as the search to replace Lawrence Frank unfolds.

More at the link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Little early for fluff pieces.

It's the "other people do it so it's OK that we do it too" argument. It's an almost childish article in that regard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Langlois is usually a hack, but that was actually a pretty good article.

The Pistons offer a lot of attractive assets to a future coach. While somewhat flawed, their PF/C is set for 10+ years. They can hopefully plug another starting lineup hole via the draft. They probably have a veteran PG returning. Knight isn't the ideal starting SG but you could do a lot worse. Then you have upwards of $30M in cap space (If they want it all).

Any coach worried about stability can just ask for a 4 year guaranteed deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Langlois is usually a hack, but that was actually a pretty good article.

The Pistons offer a lot of attractive assets to a future coach. While somewhat flawed, their PF/C is set for 10+ years. They can hopefully plug another starting lineup hole via the draft. They probably have a veteran PG returning. Knight isn't the ideal starting SG but you could do a lot worse. Then you have upwards of $30M in cap space (If they want it all).

Any coach worried about stability can just ask for a 4 year guaranteed deal.

I can see Dumars' pitch to a potential HC candidate now...."Join us....you could do a lot worse!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can see Dumars' pitch to a potential HC candidate now...."Join us....you could do a lot worse!"

Thats how I won my gf over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think most would agree that the amount of coaching turnover has been a problem, but for all those who complain about it, does anyone think Joe fired anyone that shouldn't have been fired? From the sounds of things Joe didn't want to fire Carlisle, would have rather LB not be a dink and screw things up for basically no reason at all(seriously, he could still be coaching the Pistons right now if he didn't get some nonsensical wanderlust after 2 seasons), hate on Flip all you want...there's no guarantee that anyone else would have been able to do any better then 3 ECF's, he had his hands tied financially and chose the wrong up and coming assistant in Kuester, and didn't want to hire Frank. So there have certainly been some mistakes he's made in this department but I guess at the end of the day you can't blame it all on him.

Hopefully he can bring a top candidate to the table who can demand a bit more say in the process, and get full support from upper management. Anyone who thinks this looks like a bad job is dreaming. Sure, JVG doesn't want it. With some of the things he's said about Detroit in the past, I'm pretty sure he wasn't a candidate anyway. I'd like to see McMillan or Sloan personally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeff Van Gundy blasts Joe Dumars for making Lawrence Frank Detroit Pistons' scapegoat | MLive.com

"Detroit Pistons basketball slogan: When the going gets tough, we fire the coach," Van Gundy said. "It's unbelievable. It's unbelievable. You know what surprises me, Chris? These new owners in Detroit have to be exceedingly bright to have made as much money as they have. And to be duped again that your G.M. tells you that the roster is good and the coach is bad ... what was the problem with Michael Curry? What was John Kuester? Now Lawrence. They run through coaches and they haven't even begun to address their problem. They have very little talent and very little basketball character. You combine that, you're going to be in a long rebuild.

"I'm just surprised that when everybody acknowledges it's a player's league – everybody would agree with that – then the most important player or person in any organization is the person that picks the players. But we don't, as organizations, examine them. We just take the easy way out time and time again. You lose, the G.M. convinces the owner 'We got good players. It's the coach's fault.' We fire the coach; we bring a new coach in; we continue to lose. We fire that coach, saying that 'We have better players.' It just goes on and on. It's typical and I can't believe that the Detroit owners fell for it. I just can't believe it."

More at the link

This is the first time I'm seeing the JVG comments. He makes himself look really silly in my opinion.

He has a legit complaint that Dumars is the one that keeps hiring the bad coaches and shouldn't get another shot at this. But he totally discredits anything he says when he asks what was wrong with Curry and Kuester.

Curry was in so far over his head it wasn't even funny. His post game comments were so head scratching you often wondered if he was even talking about basketball. Kuester had a full blown player mutiny that no coach would have survived, he had to go. He probably should have been fired right then and was lucky to last until the end of the year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate to be "that guy" but my interest in Piston basketball has never been lower. I used to watch/DVR every single game. Granted, we were pretty good so that helped. I have the NBA league pass to watch Detroit and I did not watch one full game this year. I just can't stomach seeing Dumars picking another head coach. If the ownership is okay with the apathy then so be it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jeff Van Gundy blasts Joe Dumars for making Lawrence Frank Detroit Pistons' scapegoat | MLive.com

This is the first time I'm seeing the JVG comments. He makes himself look really silly in my opinion.

He has a legit complaint that Dumars is the one that keeps hiring the bad coaches and shouldn't get another shot at this. But he totally discredits anything he says when he asks what was wrong with Curry and Kuester.

.

To me the more legitimate complaint is a GM blaming the poor play of an assembly of bad players on the coach. Whether it's a good or bad coach hardly matters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To me the more legitimate complaint is a GM blaming the poor play of an assembly of bad players on the coach. Whether it's a good or bad coach hardly matters.

A lot of people around here were predicting the Pistons would be .500 this year. The roster didn't change that much during the season and when it did they certainly weren't on their way to .500.

So did we all get it just as wrong as Dumars or is Frank maybe a bad coach?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A lot of people around here were predicting the Pistons would be .500 this year. The roster didn't change that much during the season and when it did they certainly weren't on their way to .500.

So did we all get it just as wrong as Dumars or is Frank maybe a bad coach?

"A lot of people around here were predicting the Pistons would be .500"

A team that didn't sustain a 400 percentage in a short season and had a losing record in April. I guess I not sure why.

"The roster didn't change that much during the season"

I thought our best player was the rookie.

"So did we all get it just as wrong as Dumars or is Frank maybe a bad coach?"

How about "Bad team, worse coach"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Motown Sports Blog



  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      96,736
    • Total Posts
      2,999,387
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
×
×
  • Create New...