Jump to content

stanpapi

MotownSports Fan
  • Content Count

    11,658
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

stanpapi last won the day on January 8

stanpapi had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

422 Excellent

About stanpapi

  • Rank
    MotownSports Fan
  • Birthday 02/14/1970

Converted

  • Location
    USA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I don't have anything to say about the process. I just literally watched the speaker of the house grin about impeaching a president and then refer to Lincoln as one of our "founding fathers". How can anyone take a process seriously that was as ridiculously partisan as this one and begun by someone who has clearly lost it upstairs? And then she has the audacity to say impeachment is "forever"? There is a notion that Trump could take this to the supreme court and request that it be thrown out as frivolous. I don't know if his lawyers are investigating that avenue or not, but her need to refer to it as "forever" while smiling demonstrates everything that is wrong with the democrats. And by the way....All I'm hearing is crickets here about Flynn rescinding his guilty plea -after I was taunted about this countless times on this board. But now? oh, yeah, none of you have anything in response. Why? Because the board gets really quiet when you are collectively dead *** wrong about something.
  2. Avenati arrested by IRS....Oh how the former darling of the MTS board has fallen. https://mobile.twitter.com/zillygirlaz/status/1217291993891500032
  3. When is Flynn going to rescind his guilty plea, you have all asked me, quite annoyingly....for months? how about.....now? Don’t look now.....I’m right again. https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1217256719753064450 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WKHZ9mTLwKLtgw2-YBBBhxtYOikoUFbw/view
  4. So you agree that obama took out bin laden purely for political reasons? No, of course you don't. And you shouldn't here, either. Soleimani was a dirty player that needed to go. Trump escalated what he was willing to do because of all the ratcheting up the iranians were doing in recent months- culminating with the embassy and the dead US contractor. This either gets iran to stop or next time we take out the little economy they actually have. It's their choice. But to say this guy hadn't killed tons of Americans, like bin laden, is just erroneous.
  5. direct deposit is an absolute must. I can't even fathom why an employee wouldn't do it in this day and age.
  6. https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/first-time-26-years-u-150735277.html First time in 26 years. That is indeed a long time.
  7. Yeah, they can't even purge the voter rolls properly when a judge holds them in contempt. https://www.wisn.com/article/judge-holds-elections-officials-in-contempt-for-not-purging-wisconsin-voters/30501616#
  8. You guys really should have gone to court to get a judge to rule on that before you drafted those articles. Oh well.
  9. I believe if you go back and look at my bin laden post, you'll see it wasn't in response to any of your posts. It was a free standing post. This said, it is hypocritical to suggest Trump needs congress to take out a terrorist, or suggest Trump acted without proper military and other intelligence about what soleimani was up to while never questioning that for other presidents. This is the double standard that exists with respect to this presidency. Despite this, we have iran's senior player off the chessboard, all they did is kick up some dust in response, we have new sanctions against them and no war was started. And now they also know Trump is going to put his foot on their throat if they do something stupid again.
  10. If iran had come out and admitted the mistake, it might be different. What they've done is cover it up and bulldoze the site. That's all the proof you need- along with the cell phone footage- of what happened. Quite honestly, Ukraine is well within its rights to take action in response- up to and including military action.
  11. No. I didn't post it because it was inconsistent with the hypocrisy of the rest of the posters here (i.e., celebrate when its obama but question integrity when Trump does the same thing). In your case, commenting that killing bin laden wouldn't change anything was clearly erroneous- it effectively spelled the end for that organization. Your post just wasn't hypocritical in the same sense of the other posters.
  12. I saw one or two of yours. You were hand wringing that it wasn't worth killing him I believe because it wasn't going to change anything.
  13. Trump has already released the transcript of a call with a foreign leader which is pretty darn remarkable. He's already been forced to compromise that for future presidents, because now, whenever anyone bitches about a president, it will be "he should release the transcript". Please note for posterity that it was this democrat congress that forced that to become necessary due to their rampant paranoia. And as for privilege, it's been exercised extensively by former presidents. You had no issue when obama or clinton did it. Oh, look, I found another double standard today on MTS. And, news flash, no president wants their NSA director talking about conversations with foreign leaders or how policy was derived. That's a slippery slope.
  14. You shouldn't call your friends here racist for not applauding Trump's work on Soleimani. That's not very nice.
×
×
  • Create New...