Jump to content


MotownSports Fan
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Walt last won the day on February 17 2017

Walt had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

313 Excellent

1 Follower

About Walt

  • Rank
    MotownSports Fan
  • Birthday 05/01/1978


  • Location
    Saint Paul, MN


  • Occupation

Recent Profile Visitors

1,067 profile views
  1. Political Pot-pourri

    If the moderators were weeding anyone out anymore, you'd be long gone, so be careful what you wish for.
  2. Political Pot-pourri

    I agree, we need a control group. ;^)
  3. CC and BCC

    In my fake baseball league, that is referred to as "Andying" an email.
  4. Thanks, Obamacare!

    You expect a lot of enrollment midnight to noon on Sundays?
  5. Yep, its funny the folks that actually understand things don't have interest in answering ill-formed "questions" predicated on BS.
  6. Haven't checked in the last couple of days, but was happy to see that the articles that I saw last week had the predictable response. Oh BTW, if you replace YouTube video with blog post, this makes for a nice synopsis of this thread.
  7. He's already explained it once...
  8. Asked and answered. Are you cherry picking what you read and respond to now as well? (That is rhetorical, as this has been the MO all along.) I explained to you the problems with each of your questions. I take no responsibility for you doubling down on flawed inquiry.
  9. Science is only as complicated as it needs to be. I think the problem is that we as a society are less equipped to understand it, as has been demonstrated repeatedly in this thread.
  10. POTUS Impeachment Watch

    You forgot the grey poupon thing. [emoji6]
  11. With this group, actually being qualified is grounds for outright dismissal.
  12. Let's explore these claims with a little more rigor, just for fun. I avoided answering a question that implicitly made false assumptions, and tried to best answer a reasonable question that I though you might be trying to convey. I did my best with your poor question. I was referring to your attempts to use poor and incomplete information to make broader conclusion cherry picking. Much of your arguments made on the topic have been textbook examples of cherry picking information. It would take rigorous data to change my position since my position is based on the same. Answering your silly question doesn't require this, for the same reason. Neither, since this is a cherry picked from a larger set of global data, and the question is incompletely formed. Never, because I don't make such predictions, don't particularly enjoy sailing, and the science has already been written.
  13. To be fair, you should leave open the possibility that there is some lack of capability to possibly counterweight the lack of willingness.
  14. Like I said: The more you "discuss" this topic, the more it is obvious that you have no understanding of it.