Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCouga
How am I supposed to debate someone who is predisposed to believing in paranoid fantasies?
Check out the post you made above. In it, you claimed:
- Obama is creating a "presidential citizen police force"
- One of Obama's recent appointments "laid out detailed plans to silence media opposition"
- Our government under Obama is "Nationalizing the banks, big industry, or the health care system"
- People in the Obama government "support violent revolution and overthrow of the government"
- and, finally, Obama has "advisors who support Eugenics...[and] euthanasia"
None of those are true. None of those claims even remotely come close to reality. How am I supposed to engage upon the comedy of debating you if you make such claims?
Those are nothing but conspiracy theories and paranoid fantasies. If you believe those are true, than, I'm sorry to say, I believe that there is no hope of engaging in rational debate with you.
And I don't think you realize what an ad hominem attack is. Attacking your ideas is not an ad hominem attack. Since there is absolutely nothing to substantiate what you are saying, it is fair for me to call out that what you are saying has no basis in reality. I don't really think you believe in the conspiracy theories you outlined earlier. I think you just don't like Obama, and want to provoke people that do. I don't think you are paranoid or delusional. I think you just have your political blinders on. |
Look, just because you aren't aware of the issues you talk about, doesn't mean they aren't true and people who bring these things to light and disagree with them are necessarily right wing conspiracist. This is what I mean when I say you can't be calling people who disagree with your points and know much more about the topics you participate in "nut jobs" and "right wing whackos" or "conservative conspiracy theorists".
I don't know what level of education you have, I'm more into truth then I am into political party, and I have a strong background in American and World History and draw on this to interpret events of the day. Everything has basically been tried before, and patterns arise as to the end goal. One of the reason I despise liberal democrats is because they aren't truthful about their end goals in public.
You don't realize what an ad hominem attack is, you attacked me as a right wing conspiracy theorists, or whack job or nut job that's how you finish each post you make, you did it again in this post. You are dismissing the argumenter rather then the argument.
Example: How am I supposed to debate someone who is predisposed to believing in paranoid fantasies?
You didn't debate you attacked me as the poster, rather then coming up with factual information to rebuke the claims I made. This is the very definition of an Ad Hominem attack (Logic 101).
1. Civilian National Police Force
Citizen Police Force? - NoPC Forums
2. Mark Lloyd - FCC "Diversity Czar" on Chavez/Free Speech.
YouTube - Obama's Czar Mark Lloyd's FCC 'Diversity' Chief - His Take on Free Speech
YouTube - FCC Diversity Czar Mark Lloyd discussing plans to shut down conservative media
3. Nationalizing banks, big industry, health care - do you know what nationalizing means? The government has taken stock in many large financial institutions through the bailouts, the government took over GM and took stock, they are trying to Nationalize the health care system at the moment (you probably have seen something about that).
4. Support Violent revolution - Van Jones - communist/anarchist/revolutionary
Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: Van Jones and “revolution”
Pat Dollard | Young Americans | Blog Archive » Van Jones Movie Espouses Communist Revolution In America
5. Science Czar - John Holdren -
John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar, says: Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet,
John Holdren and Harrison Brown,
informationliberation - John Holdren and Harrison Brown: Lifelong intellectual infatuation with eugenics-minded futurist casts shadow over Science Czar Holdren's worldview. he's written books about forced population control and is acknowledged biggest scientific influence is a leading eugenicist.
“organized evasive action: population control, limitation of material consumption, redistribution of wealth, transitions to technologies that are environmentally and socially less disruptive than today’s, and movement toward some kind of world government” - EcoScience
Ezekial Emanuel - Known supporter of euthanasia for decades, brother of Rahm.
Facta, Non Verba "Deeds, Not Words" Conservative Blog: Obama's Depopulation/Euthanasia/Death Care Plan Exposed - Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel (brother of Rahm) Advocates Euthanasia in Obama's Government-Run Plan